UK Fans: For a bit of perspective, look at UCLA
It is a tumultuous time in the Bluegrass State.
The University of Kentuky baskeball team, with its great history, has no head basketball coach.
Tubby Smith left Kentucky to become the University of Minnesota head coach after 10 seasons at UK. During his tenure, he won the following:
- A national championship
- 5 SEC regular season titles
- 5 SEC tourney titles
- An overall record of 263 wins and 83 losses ( a 26-8 average)
And it wasn't enough. After 2 mediocre years (after an Elite 8 appearance and a loss in OT in 2005 that would have gotten them to a Final 4), Tubby felt enough pressure to say to heck with the greatest job in college basketball. The fans were calling for his firing, the Athletic Director was mandating changes in his coaching staff (primarily for recruiting) and Tubby looked for greener pastures.
Minnesota?
Hardly "greener" pastures, but the head coaching job at Minnesota has reasonable expecations. And if Tubby delivers the same or even a little less quality for the Golden Gophers, he'll be enshrined as a God in the state.
So, what causes a pro like Smith to leave the "best job" in all of college hoops for the rule breaking backwaters of Minnesota?
Kentucky expectations.
There is no other job in college basketball, including the historical powerhouses of North Carolina, Duke and Kansas, that demand, no REQUIRE, absolute excellence year in and year out.
Wait a moment. Take a breath. Count to three.
Who is missing from this list? Well only the program with the highest number of National Championships in the history of the NCAA. Namely, the UCLA Bruins. A program that holds the records for consecutive wins, consecutive national championships and home of Coach Wooden, the strait laced flip side to Kentucky's Coach Rupp. UCLA has also experienced, since Coach Wooden's retirement, periods of mediocrity and excellence, much like Kentucky, but without the turmoil, the scrutiny, the gnashing of teeth.
Why?
Is it the laid back surfer attitude of California?
Hard to say really, but one can differentiate the expectations of both programs by their fans fairly simply.
Kentucky fans, aside from their great love of the program, are unreasonable, and some of them are borderline insane.
The facts are these:
The new millenium has delivered an era of parity unlike recent decades. And coaches with "elite" programs have become as ubiquitous in delivering talent and teams across the board. Look at Thad Matta at Ohio State or Rich Barnhard at Texas to find the best recruits this year. Georgetown has found a resurgeance behind John Thompson III, and if the entire Florida team doesn't take the money and run after last year's championship, would they be in the Final 4 again?
NO.
So to the "elite" teams, and Kentucky, I submit the following:
GET USED TO IT YOU LOONS.
You might get Billy Donovan, you might Get Tom Izzo, you might get John Calipari, but NONE OF THESE GUYS are going to deliver Final 4 after Final 4. To expect anything remotely resembling this in today's college hoops market is just nuts. 2 great seasons in a row is a miracle, so enjoy them if you can, but each Final 4 is miracle unto itself, and no program has a guarantee.
UK fans, if you get Billy Donovan, I hope you give him the patience he deserves. But regardless of who takes the job, you'll never see a run like UCLA under Wooden, so be happy with greatness when it arrives, rather than grumble when it is absent. UCLA fans seem to be able get over it, can you?





























